Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In



Three Reasons To Rethink Heart-Rate Training

Could it be possible your heart-rate monitor is holding you back from reaching your potential?

Could it be possible your heart-rate monitor is holding you back from reaching your potential?

The potential benefits of training with a heart-rate monitor have been so ubiquitously espoused in running magazines that many runners feel it’s an absolute necessity to train by heart rate.

In my experience as a coach and athlete, training by heart rate is less accurate and more problematic than training by pace and feel unless you are a very experienced runner. It’s true that heart-rate monitors can keep you in the right training zones, prevent overtraining, and help monitor progress. But, what if those potential benefits are outweighed by the inherent limitations of heart-rate training? Could it be possible your heart rate monitor is holding you back from reaching your potential?

RELATED: Are Runners Too Tech Dependent?

In the following pages attempt to answer these questions as we explore the limitations of training strictly by heart-rate.

1. Fluctuations Do Not Correspond To Effort Levels

Perhaps the biggest limitation to heart-rate training is that many changes in your heart rate do not correlate to your fitness level. Sleep, stress, and dehydration can all raise or lower heart rate on any given day. As normal people with jobs, families, and otherwise busy lives, these outside influencers are common and can have a drastic affect on your heart rate readings. Let’s take a look at a few of those factors:

Sleep And Heart Rate Variability

Many studies have concluded that a lack of sleep, a reality that many runners are plagued with, will elevate your heart rate 5-10 beats per minute (bpm). While this may not seem like a big change, coupled with the other factors listed below, a lack of sleep could cause you to train at heart-rate levels that are below your optimal training zones.

In addition, you naturally have a lower heart rate in the morning than you do at night. Even further, heart rate can vary by 2-4 bpm from one day to the next without any changes to fitness or fatigue. Therefore, you need to adjust your heart rate to accommodate for the time of day you’ll be attacking the roads and factor in daily variability.

RELATED: Training With A HR Monitor


Stress has the same affect on your heart rate as a lack of sleep. One study in particular showed that workplace stress raised heart rates by 4-6 bpm. This is an important statistic for runners who train after work.

Unlike sleep, an exact measurement of your stress level, and therefore the exact increase in your heart rate, is difficult to determine. While running is a great way to reduce the effects of stress, the elevated heart rates you experience while in a stressful state will change the heart rates at which you should be running.


As runners with busy lives, caffeine often becomes the fuel that runs our day — for better or worse. While staying awake at work is ideal, studies have shown that caffeine elevates heart rate for up to 24 hours after ingestion.

Like stress, it is difficult to measure the exact change in heart rate you’ll experience when consuming caffeine because we all react individually to its effects. Runners who are accustomed to caffeine will be less affected than those who only drink the occasional cup of coffee.


Weather also has a dramatic influence on heart rate. During hot days, your heart rate will increase as your body works to cool itself down. In hot and humid conditions, blood is sent to the skin to aid in the cooling process. This means there is less available blood and oxygen for your working muscles. Therefore, your heart has to work harder to maintain the same pace and effort during your run.

Conversely, heart rate will decrease (or more accurately, underestimate the intensity of exercise) in response to training in cold environments. Researchers posit that training in cold temperatures results in an increase in stroke volume and thus a higher V02 max, which will lower the perceived effort and reduce your heart rate.


Finally, dehydration has a profound effect on heart rate. In one study, researchers found that cyclists who exercised in a dehydrated state exhibited heart-rate readings that were 5-7.5% higher than normal. Like the above factors, training in a dehydrated state can drastically influence your heart-rate training zones.

While each of these factors by themselves aren’t cause to throw your heart-rate monitor out the window, when you combine their effects, you can easily be exercising outside your target heart-rate zones on any given day. Likewise, the exact measurement of your stress levels, caffeine intake, and heart rate variability can be difficult to pinpoint, leaving you guessing at your actual heart-rate levels.

2. Lack Of Concrete Data Needed To Establish Training Zones

Another inherent drawback to heart-rate training is how difficult it is to establish your max heart rate and the accurate training zones that result from that figure. While a quick Google search reveals a myriad of formulas to help you find your max heart rate, the problem with formulas is that they are based on an average. What if you’re not average? Not only that, but is maximum heart rate really the best predictor of training zones?

RELATED: How Long Before I See The Benefits Of A Workout?

Starting With Accurate Measurements Of MHR

In order to establish proper training zones, an athlete must first determine their maximum heart rate. Unfortunately, a majority of runners use simple formulas (does 220 minus age ring a bell?), which have a high degree of error.

To get an accurate measure of your maximum heart rate, you should partake in a graded exercise test, but locating a facility that can accommodate this type of testing isn’t easily found.  Likewise, a graded exercise test isn’t going to be appropriate for a beginner runner who can’t handle such a stressful workout.

Therefore, many runners who control their effort by heart rate may be doomed from the start by using faulty max heart rates.

Training Zones And Correlation With Lactate Levels

Training with a heart rate monitor requires adherence to a specific set of heart-rate zones, each of which is designed to elicit a particular exercise intensity. Unfortunately, maximum heart rate is not the ideal way to measure the body’s response to exercise. Rather, blood lactate levels are more accurate.

In fact, research has demonstrated that there is no predictable relationship between heart rate and lactate threshold. Lactate threshold tends to occur at around 90% of maximum heart rate in well-trained runners, but it can occur at 50% of maximum heart rate for beginners. Therefore, your optimal training zones could be far outside what traditional heart rate training advocates suggest.

3. Faulty Readings=Inaccurate Data

While I have been rather scientific thus far, perhaps my biggest gripe in regards to heart-rate monitor training is the unreliable data. From a training and coaching standpoint, I am not willing to make my training decisions based on devices that don’t work or regularly send mixed signals.

Conduct a quick poll of your running friends about issues they’ve had with their monitor over the last month and you’ll get more crazy malfunctioning stories than I could list in this article. Here are some of the ones I have experienced lately: (1) receiver not transmitting because too sweaty; (2) receiver not transmitting because too cold; (3) ran too close to another heart-rate monitor; (4) took off monitor and it still recorded readings in my pocket; (5) watch said my heart rate was 250 bpm; and numerous other stories I won’t list here.

As a competitive runner and coach, if I am going to rely on the data I am receiving to make the best decisions about training, I need to be confident that it’s correct at least 95 percent of the time. Otherwise, I may be making training decisions based on irrelevant and inaccurate information.