Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In



Ask The Experts: Can I Get Faster At 40?


Dear Experts,

I’m 39 years old (40 in November) and have been running for five years after a long stretch of inactivity during my 20s and early 30s.  I have run off and on since I was about 10, so I consider myself an experienced runner.  I am competing in duathlons and have toyed with the idea of putting that on hold for a year or two to see how much more I could develop my running before the age slowdown starts occurring.  However, I’d like to know if this is reasonable.

I had a breakthrough half marathon this year and ran a 1:21:49, which was a PR by almost two minutes. I know that’s not blazing fast, but I’d like to see what I have left in me and see if I can improve upon that.  I’m currently running five or six times a week totaling 40-45 MPW on average. I think that if I want to get much faster I may need to focus more on running and try and get my mileage around the 50-60 MPW range.  Obviously, this would probably cut into my bike time and may limit my duathlon racing.

I’m finishing up Matt’s book, RUN: The Mid-Body Method of Running by Feel, and think that my running style/approach is that which the book focuses on. I’m just looking for more information on what my next steps are to continue to develop my running further.


John M.


Dear John,

I can relate to your situation, as I’m also 39 years old and trying to achieve at least one more lifetime-best performance before it’s too late. So the advice I’m about to give you is based on what I’m doing in my own training in hopes of peaking in middle age.

To begin, yes, it is reasonable, given your circumstances, to believe that you can still improve your half-marathon PR. If you were a 39-year-old hardcore veteran who had already run 16 marathons and logged more 100-mile weeks than he could remember, I’d say you had no chance. But you haven’t come close to doing all you could do in training to stimulate improvement, and by exploiting some of that untapped potential you can more than make up for the effects of age on your performance capacity.

It is clear that you understand there is no way to take your performance to the next level without training harder in some way. Increasing your running mileage is one way to do that, but not the only way, nor necessarily the best way.  You could also keep your running mileage about the same and increase your cross-training, in order to boost your endurance and cardiovascular fitness without increasing your injury risk. You could also keep your running mileage about the same and make your key running workouts harder.

If you are fairly injury resistant, increasing your running mileage is probably worth a try. But don’t expect to perform much better on, say, 60 miles a week of running plus 60 miles a week of cycling than you have on 45 miles a week of running plus 100 miles a week of cycling. That strikes me as a wash. To stimulate another breakthrough, you’ll likely need to increase your running without reducing your cycling much, or else combine a shift from cycling to running with other measures.

On that point, I don’t want to assume that you are not accustomed to doing really hard workouts, but in my experience very few runners at our “recreationally competitive” level do really hard workouts on a regular basis. I’m talking about going to the track and blasting 12 quarters at mile race pace, running hill repeats until you’re literally lightheaded, and planning threshold runs that are so tough you actually get butterflies in your stomach before you do them. If you are doing anything less, then this is the single most effective training change you can make toward improving your performance. Increasing mileage is often the lazy, copout way to seek improvement. Making brutally hard workouts a consistent part of one’s routine is far more potent, although tough for many runners to face.

I’d also like to draw your attention to what is lost at our age: power, strength, top-end speed, flexibility, and mobility. Endurance, aerobic power and economy start to slide later. Therefore, the best way for a 39-year-old runner to slow the hands of time is to make a big commitment to strength training, plyometrics, sprinting, stretching, and mobility work. This is a major initiative of my latest comeback, and I strongly encourage you to follow my cue.

At age 56, triathlon legend Dave Scott is still fit enough to complete an Ironman in less than nine hours. For reference, the Hawaii Ironman course record for his age group is around 9:45. When I asked Dave how he had managed to hang on to his performance to such an unprecedented degree through the years, he cited his lifelong weightlifting habit as the most important factor. More than anything else you can do as a runner, strength training keeps the muscles young.

I hope these ideas are helpful. As a fellow child of the early ‘70s fleeing Father Time, I’m rooting for you!


To learn more about our experts, as well as to read answers to other submitted questions, visit the Ask The Experts homepage. Have a question for Mario or Matt? Submit it here. [sgi:MattFitzgerald]